A better way to do video advertising.
Who wants to watch a conventionally delivered (unsolicited) commercial? Almost no one.
The only people who might want to watch a commercial about a given product are people who are in the market for that product.
So, rather than bother people with commercials they don't want to see, wouldn't it be better to let people request commercials about the types of products they plan to buy and then deliver those video ads? Yes, it would, but that's not enough because a buyer who requests commercials would be flooded with them.
The economic solution is to let people request paymercials, video ads that include a payment to buyers for viewing them.
Attaching a buyer payment to a commercial does a few good things. One, it gives buyers an extra incentive to watch. Two, it gives buyers a way of choosing among videos that are presented in search results. And, three, it enforces relevancy by penalizing any advertiser that shows an uncompetitive or unsuitable product.
From an advertiser's point of view, pay-the-buyer video can be better because the message is focused on imminent buyers. If an advertiser's video provides useful information, it can be longer than a 30-second spot because real buyers are usually really interested in product information.
The amount of money that can be paid to buyers for viewing a commercial ranges from tens of cents to tens of dollars, depending on the value of the product. Honda might pay compact car buyers $15.00 EV to view an ad about a Civic, while Colgate-Palmolive might pay toothpaste buyers $.50 EV to view an ad about Total toothpaste.